Friday, June 14, 2013

चे गुएरा-एक नाम है क्रांति का.

Ernesto "Che" Guevara (June14 1928 – October 9, 1967)
चे गुएरा-
एक नाम है,
क्रांति का,
एक गरीब का.
एक सर्वहारा का,
एक दलित का,
एक मजदूर का,
एक किसान का,
एक जूनून का,


चे गुएरा में छिपे है कई चे..
एक लेनिन.
एक भगत सिंह,
एक बिरसा,
एक आंबेडकर.
एक पेरियार,

और वो आम आदमी,जो लड़ रहा है..
बुर्जुआ के खिलाफ,
कुलक के खिलाफ,
पूंजीवाद के खिलाफ और,
साम्राज्यवाद के खिलाफ.


चे गुएरा एक अहसास है-
एक जवानी का,
एक मोहब्बत का,
एक आस का,
कि हम होंगे कामयाब,
कि ख़त्म कर देंगे,
शोषणकारी व्यवस्था को,
भ्रष्ट इजारेदारी को,
साम्राज्यवाद को,
पूँजीवाद को.


चे एक सपना है-
वर्ग-विहीन, जाति-विहीन समाज का,
मानववाद का,
समाजवाद का.

Thursday, April 18, 2013

JOINT Statement on the Implementation of OBC Reservation in JNU at all Level in the Faculty Recruitment


JOINT Statement on the Implementation of OBC Reservation at all Level in the Faculty Recruitment
 

Yet again JNU administration has betrayed OBC reservation in faculty positions – at associate professor and professor level. The recent advertisement (ADVT. NO. RC/44/2012) for the recruitment of faculties at associate professor and professor level has not marked quota for OBC reservation, though it has marked reservation for SC/ST.  This is in clear violation of Article 16(4) of the Constitution which states, “Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.” But the casteist forces of JNU and other University administration are using such a tactics and convenient logic to deny the constitutional rights of the socially deprived community by some time making reference to government policy and sometime to the UGC guideline. Since the opening of this university there has been no OBC reservation in faculty positions at any level. It is the glittering fact that there is a dearth of OBC faculties in the campus. In spite of making effort to ensure the OBC reservation in positions of faculty, there have been deliberate attempts to scuttle the OBC reservation in the faculty recruitment by the administration. After long fight with administration and persuading Academic Council, OBC vacancies at assistant level have been filled in last recruitment - ADVT. NO. RC/42/2011.

When some of us met the rector and enquired about the anomalies in the OBC reservation in faculty appointment, she informed that we are following UGC Guideline and there are no lapses or contradictions in following the stipulated rules and regulations. When we further asked rector that Central University of Kerala and Central University of Orissa are giving OBC reservation at all level, is it that UGC is issuing different directives to different central universities, she replied that ‘we do not know’ how they are giving such reservation. She also said that if we do not follow UGC guideline in faculty recruitment, we will face the difficulty in making payment to the faculties. As per our knowledge UGC does not give financial aid under the particular head, it is up to the university to decide how to spend it. Here it is very conspicuous that JNU administration is interpreting GOI and UGC directives in a particular manner to suit their own casteist interests and though it is quite possible to provide the OBC reservation at all level in the faculty recruitment. They are misinterpreting the entry level to provide OBC reservation and UGC also helped in abetting this confusion more. This entry level in order to give reservation is being narrowed down to only assistant professor level whereas in the direct recruitment of associate professor or professor is to be understood as entry level except in promotion. The recent IIT Kanpur has advertised for the faculty recruitment and clearly said that OBC reservation will be given at the entry without saying that it is only at assistant professor level. It shows how indifferent attitude they have regarding the social justice, in spite of enquiring to know how the other universities are providing OBC reservation regarding to doing the same in JNU, they are doing away with such responsibility.

The fight for social justice needs to be sharpened and continued, as administration is putting one after another roadblocks to scuttle the social justice. We are of the clear view that to realize social justice, reservation is to be given at all level of faculty positions which is mandatory to ensure the representation of Socially Backward Communities. Though, some of the central universities like, Central University of Kerala and Central University of Orissa do provide OBC reservations in their faculty recruitment at all level. But JNU is still pursuing arbitrariness and highhandedness in faculty recruitment and going against the spirit of Constitution.

The undersigned organizations urge JNUSU to take up this issue with utmost seriousness and forge the struggle for social justice and get implemented OBC quota at all level in faculty appointment.
 

AISA, AISF, DSF, DSU , SFI, SFR, UDSF, and CONCERNED STUDENTS

 
 


Saturday, December 15, 2012

मंडल कमीशन की सिफ़ारिशे....




मंडल कमीशन 7 अगस्त 1990 को तत्कालीन प्रधानमंत्री विश्वनाथ प्रताप सिंह ने लागू किया था. मंडल कमीशन की सिफारिशें निम्नलिखित है-
1-      अनु. 15(4) और 16(4) के तहत 50% आरक्षण की सीलिंग है और SCs/ STs को उनकी आबादी के अनुपात में 22% मिला हुआ है. अतः कमीशन OBCs के लिए 27% आरक्षण प्रस्तावित करता है. अनु. 15(4) और अनु. 29(2)- (अल्पसंख्यकों को सरंक्षण) राज्य के ऊपर कोई वैधानिक प्रतिबन्ध नहीं करता यदि वह सामाजिक तथा शैक्षिक रूप से पिछड़े वर्गों की उन्नति के लिए विशेष प्राविधान बनाये. इसी तरह अनु.16(4)  राज्य को नहीं रोकेगा यदि राज्य  राजकीय नौकरियों तथा नियुक्तियों में  सामाजिक तथा शैक्षिक रूप से पिछड़े वर्गों को उचित प्रतिनिधित्व न होने से पदों तथा नियुक्तियों में उनके लिए आरक्षण की अनुसंशा करे.
2-      सरकारी नौकरियों में शामिल OBC  उम्मीदवारों को प्रोन्नति में भी 27% आरक्षण मिलना चाहिए.
3-      केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों के अधीन चलने वाली वैज्ञानिक, तकनीकी तथा प्रोफेशनल शिक्षण संस्थानों में दाखिले के लिए OBC वर्गों के छात्र-छात्राओं के लिए 27% आरक्षण लागू किया जाये.
4-      OBC की आबादी वाले क्षेत्रों में वयस्क शिक्षा केंद्र तथा पिछड़ें वर्गों के छात्र-छात्राओं के लिए आवासीय विद्यालय खोले जाए. OBC  छात्रों को रोजगार परक शिक्षा  दी जाये.
5-       OBC की विशाल आबादी जीविका के लिए पारंपरिक तथा जातिपरक काम में लगी हुयी है. इनकी दयनीय आर्थिक हालत को देखते हुए इन्हें संस्थागत वित्तीय, तकनीकी सहायता देने तथा इनमें उद्यमी द्रष्टिकोण विकसित करने के लिए वित्तीय, तकनीकी संस्थाओं का समूह तैयार करे.
6-      प्रत्येक जाति परक पेशे के लिए सहकारी समितियां गठित की जाये जिनके तमाम कार्यकर्ता, कर्मचारी और अधिकारीगण उसी जातिगत पेशे से जुड़े होने चाहिए.
7-       जमींदारी प्रथा को ख़त्म करने के लिए भूमि सुधार कानून लागू किया जाये क्योंकि पिछड़े वर्गों की बड़ी जमात जमींदारी प्रथा से सताई हुयी है.
8-      सरकार द्वारा अनुबंधित जमीन को न केवल ST/ST को दिया जाये बल्कि OBC को भी इसमें शामिल किया जाये.
9-       OBC के कल्याण के लिए राज्य सरकारों द्वारा बनाई गयी तथा चलायी जा रही तमाम योजनाओ, कार्यक्रमों को लागू करने के लिए केंद्र सरकार द्वारा राज्य सरकारों को वित्तीय सहायता प्रदान की जाये.
10-    केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों में OBC  के हितों की सुरक्षा के लिए अलग मंत्रालय/विभाग स्थापित किये जाये.
11-    आयोग की अनुशंसाओं का क्या परिणाम निकला, उन्हें कहाँ तक लागू किया गया इसकी समीक्षा 20 वर्ष के बाद की जाये.

Monday, September 24, 2012

The Untouchables - Bhagat Singh (Published in ‘Kirti’ (Punjabi) June 1929)


Our country is in a really bad shape; here strangest questions are asked, the foremost concerns the untouchables, who count 6 crores in population of 30 crores.

For instance :-
Would the contact with an untouchable mean defilement of an upper caste?
Would the gods in the temples, not get angry by the entry of untouchables there?
Would the drinking water of a well not get polluted if the untouchables drew their water from the same well?
That these questions are being asked in the twentieth century, is a matter which makes our heads hang in shame.
We Indian boast of our spiritualism, but then, we avoid accepting every human being as a fellow being just like ourselves. Western people on the other hand, who carry a reputation of being money minded, had unequivocally affirmed their faith in the principle of equality. This they did during the revolutions in America and France and above all in Russia.
These days which is committed to the extension of this principle to all aspects of life and to ending of discriminations in any form whatsoever, thereby fulfilling the ideals of May Day declaration. But we Indians on our part who never tire of boasting about our gods and godliness are, yet seriously debating whether to permit the untouchables to wear the sacred thread or the janeu and whether the untouchables be permitted to read Vedas / Shastras. We often complain about our maltreatment in other countries, and particularly when we are maltreated by the whites, do we have any moral right to voice such a protest?
In 1926, Sindhi Muslim gentleman, Mr. Nur Mohd member of Bombay Legislative Council aptly remarked:-
“If the Hindu society refuses to allow other human beings, fellow creatures at that, to attend public schools, and if …. The president of the local board representing so many lakh of people, in his house, refuses to allow his fellows and brothers, the elementary human right of having water to drink, what right have they to ask for more rights from the bureaucracy? Before we accuse the people coming from other lands, we should see how people… how can we ask for greater political rights when (we ourselves) deny elementary rights of human beings.
How true! But since this had been said by a Muslim, Hindus lost no time in alleging that the Muslim’s real intention was to convert the untouchables to Islam and thus assimilate them into their own brotherhood. But then, it amounted to an open admission of the harsh truth--that if you (the Hindus) treat them worse than your cattle, they shall desert you, join to the fold of other religions where they hope to enjoy more rights, where they are treated as fellow beings.
Would it not then be pointless to blame the Christians and Muslims, that they were undermining Hinduism?
How fair and true! Yet the Hindus tremble in anger on hearing this plain truth. In any case, it had shaken Hindus from their complacency in the matter. Orthodox Brahimins too started re-thinking about it, also joined by some self-proclaimed reformers. At Patna a gala Hindu meet was held. Lala Lajpat Rai, known for his longstanding sympathy for the untouchables was presiding. A lot of hot arguments were exchanged as to whether the untouchables are eligible to wear sacred thread, the janeu? Could they read Vedas / Shastras? A number of social reformers lost their temper but Lala ji was able to persuade them to compromise on these two matters and thereby saved the prestige of Hindu religion; otherwise, what would have been the consequences?
Just imagine how shameful! Even a dog can sit in our lap, it can also move freely in kitchen but if a fellow human touches you, your dharma is endangered. So much so, even a reputed social reformer like Pandit Malviya ji, known for his soft corner for the untouchables, first agrees to be publicly garlanded by a sweeper, but then afterwards regards himself to be polluted till he bathes and washes those clothes. How ironical! In the temples meant for worshipping God, who lives in us all, once a poor man enters it, it gets defiled and God gets annoyed. When this is the state of affairs within the Hindu fold, does it behave us to quarrel and fight in the name of the Brotherhood? Above all, this kind of our approach to the question amounts of an ingratitude of the degree; those who provide us the comforts by doing menial jobs for us, we shun them. We could worship even animals, but would not tolerate fellow humans to sit beside us.
This is an issue of hot debate these days, the poor creatures getting special attention in this way. In the context of our advance towards national liberation, the problem of communal representation (seats in the legislatures allotted in proportion to Hindu/ Sikh/ Muslim population) may not have been beneficial in any other manner but atleast Hindu / Muslim / Sikhs are all striving hard to maximize their own respective quota of seats by attracting the maximum number of untouchables to their own respective folds. Accordingly Muslims started by providing them equal rights after converting them to Islam.
This naturally hurt the Hindus. Bitterness mounted, riots too broke out. By and by Sikhs, too woke up lest they be left behind in this race. They too started administering Amrit; tension mounted between Sikhs and Hindus over the removal of janeu or hair shaving. All in all, all the three are trying to out do the others, resulting in widespread disturbances. Christians sitting on the fence are quietly consolidating their hold.
Be as it may, this turmoil is certainly helping us to move towards the weakening of the hold of untouchability.
As for themselves, when they discovered that all this great turmoil was on their account and Hindus / Muslims / Sikhs, all were trying to profit at their cost, they have also started thinking, “Why should we not organize on our own?” No one is certain whether they are doing so as a result of official prompting or at their own but once this line of thinking had taken roots, certainly this trend is being fully backed up by official quarters. “Adi Dharam Mandal” and the like are the end result of this trend.
Here, the basic question arises, how precisely can we solve this tangle? The answer is quite obvious; above all, it needs to be settled for good, that all humans are equal without distinctions of birth or vocation. In other words since someone is born in a poor sweepers’ family, he shall continue cleaning toilets all his life and thus getting deprived of all chances of progress in life, all this nonsense. Historically speaking, when our Aryan ancestors nurtured these practices of discrimination towards these strata of society, shunning all human contact with them by labeling them as menials, and assigning all the degrading jobs to them, they also, naturally started worrying about a revolt against this system. All this is the result of your past sins; what can be done about it? Bear if silently! and with such kinds of sleeping pills, were they able to buy peace for quite some time. All the same they were guilty of a great sin on this account, since this amounted to the negation of core human values like self-esteem and self-reliance; a grossly cruel conduct by all means. Yet present is the moment of its atonement.
In a broader social perspective, untouchability had a pernicious side-effect; people in general got used to hating the jobs which were otherwise vital for life. We treated the weavers who provided us cloths as untouchable. In U.P. water carriers were also considered untouchables. All this caused tremendous damage to our progress by undermining the dignity of labour, especially manual labour. We have thus to accept it, once for all, that in order to move forward we have to give up either considering or calling them untouchables.
Everything else shall fall in place by itself.
In this regard strategy adopted by Naujwan Bharat Sabha and the Youth conference is, most apt--to seek forgiveness from those brethren, whom we have been calling untouchables by treating them as our fellow beings, without making them go through conversion ceremonies of Sikhism, Islam or Hinduism, by accepting food / water from their hands. On the other hand quarrelling among ourselves in the race to win them over, without restoring to them their human dignity is futile.
But the moment we went to villages with our message of human equality and brotherhood mentioned above, Government agents started inciting the Jat community saying that this would embolden these menials to refuse serving you. This was sufficient to provoke the jats, to oppose our efforts in the right direction.
But the upper castes should also realise that their own status in life cannot change for the better as long they persist in considering these people as inferiors, calling them menials, and keep them under their heals. It is argued, they are unclean. The harsh truth is that they are poor; remove their poverty and they shall be clean. Don’t we find that the poor even among the upper castes are no less unclean? Besides doing unclean jobs is no bad; for example mothers perform all the unclean duties for their children. Do they become unclean?
However, ultimately the problem can not be satisfactory solved unless and until untouchable communities themselves unite and organize. We regard their recent uniting to form their distinct identity, and also demanding representation equal to Muslims in legislatures, being equal to them in number, is a move in the right direction. Either reject communal representation altogether, else give these people too their due share! In principle, Councils, Assemblies are duty bound to ensure full and free access for all these communities to schools, colleges, wells and roads; that too not only on paper but by actually accompanying them to wells, schools and get them admitted there. But can these legislatures, where a lot of hue and cry is raised even over a bill to ban child marriages, on the grounds that it shall be a threat to their religion, dare to bring the untouchables to their own level on their own? No, never, that is why we plead that they must persist in pressing for their own distinct representation in legislatures in proportion to their numerical strength. We mince no words in proclaiming: Arise! So called untouchables, the real sustainers of life, awake and reflect over your past, you were the backbone of Guru Gobind Singh’s army. Shivaji was able to achieve all that with your participation which made him ever shining in history. Your sacrifices are worthy of being embedded in golden letters. The way in which you sustain us and add to our comforts ought to make us feel grateful to you. It is we who fail to appreciate. The land Alienation Act (banning transfer of land to non-agriculturist communities, defined as per caste) does not permit you to buy land ever if you manage the necessary amount of cost. The way you are being oppressed had prompted Miss Mayo of U.S.A. to label you “less then man.” As a matter of fact, without your own efforts, you shall not able to move ahead.
“Those who would be free must themselves strike the first blow.” It must be kept in mind that every one belonging to the privileged class, strives to enjoy his own rights, but would try his utmost to keep on oppressing those below him, and keeping the underprivileged under his heel. Thus might is held to be right. Then waste no time and unite to stand on your own feet and challenge the existing order of society. Let it then be seen as to who dares to deny to you your due. Do not be at the mercy of others and have no illusions about them. Be on guard so as not to fall in the trap of officialdom, because far from being your ally it seeks to make you dance on its own tunes. The capitalist bureaucratic combine is, truly speaking responsible for your oppression and poverty. Hence always shun it. Be on guard about its tricks. This is then the way out. You are the real working class. Workers unite – you have nothing to lose but your chains. Arise and rebel against the existing order. Gradualism and reformism shall be of no avail to you. Start a revolution from a social agitation and gird up your loins for political economic revolution. You and you alone are the pillars of the nations and its core strength. Awake, O sleeping lions! Rebel, raise the banner of revolt.
[Curtesy to Bhagat Singh Study (The Untouchable, Published in ‘Kirti’ (Punjabi) June 1929]

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Race in South Africa: Black viewpoint


Race in South Africa: Black viewpoint
Nomvula Ndlovu Retired nurse, Dukathole township
I lived through apartheid and I survived it. After democracy I was expecting to live a comfortable life with my children, I just never thought that I'd be poorer now than I was.

Yes racism still exists and we are faced with it from time to time, but today's oppression is from our own black government. I live in an old shack and have applied for a house numerous times but in vain. Every election the ANC visit our shacks and make us all sorts of promises about getting us houses, they even provide us with food parcels - all to get support and then they disappear until the next election season.
Both my daughter and I live on my pensioner's grant of 1,200 rand ($130; £80). We are forced to beg for food from neighbours every month because the grant does not even cover a week's worth of food.
My daughter passed her matric in 2005 and has not been able to find a job despite her good grades. I never imagined I would be facing such hardships at my age, especially not from a government led by people who are black like me.
(BBC News)

V P Singh on Social Justice




(V P Singh was at Jawaharlal Nehru University, at New Delhi to deliver his lecture at JP Memorial Lecture on 5 December, 1990)
Secularism and social justice is one subject- rather two subjects. But, I think, both are two sides of the same coin.  Secularism and social justice are today uppermost in the minds of most of us who are thinking about the future of India. In fact, I will prefer to put Secularism and social justice under one heading- one word, a much more humane word which is enshrined in our constitution also. The Issue is really the issue of fraternity of India.


Social Justice
 Coming to the issue of social equity, we see two process or two things which push on. One is recognising the factor inequity and I don’t think that it is so ugly a factor which we don’t want to look at it so, better not to look at it. At the same time, how does the social transformation take place? Social justice, to me, has to be process of social synthesis. It cannot be a process of hatred. It is process of social harmony. Well, one argument for the social harmony is to maintain the status quo. If you don’t want to disrupt the social harmony, maintain the status quo. The way, the harmony is an instrument of status quo. But, I won’t use this word social justice for social harmony. The other word which can be used is transformation. Recognising the contradiction in the inequity of the present system, how do we move to a greater harmonising equilibrium, a greater synthesis, without, in the process, sowing hatred or venom? I think, the second condition is also important because disruptive social changes can also take place. And the biggest challenge to all social reformers or to all of us, in the present system is just to recognise how it hurts a person who is born in a socially lower order. How the whole life he suffers inside? Perhaps it is, an d being one is much more honourable  than just burn within yourself  in humiliation all life.
One instance I may give you is a very tragic instance of self-immolation we saw last month. At the same time, one set of boys had come- socially and educationally backward class. They asked me: “sir, are we not the youth of this country? Are we not the students of this country? I said, “Why do you ask this question? They said: “Sir, whenever, in the papers, it comes that all the youth are in revolt-all the youth are against you- that means we are not the students of this country. In fact, that means that we are not counted”. And they said: “You have given us something, some dignity but the whole social order seems to pounce upon you as if you are giving it to some enemy, some foreigners, not to a child   this soil”. And, that is the anguish, it is not what the percentage of this or that we give. That is not the argument. We have to overcome the rung of the social order. The question arises, with such reactions: do we have one percent place in the hearts of those who run the social order? This is one very poignant feelings of those boys. And we have to take cognizance of it and then also put our heads together. I am not suggesting this solution and that solution as solution. No one can be dogmatic about these things. What is necessary is that we recognise it and put it on the national agenda. Yes, there is such a problem.
Then there was another set of boys from the Jawaharlal Nehru University of scheduled class and scheduled tribes. They came and said: “Sir, we can understand, much better than you, the abuses that are being showered on you”. I asked: “how so?” They said: “The same abuses have been showered on us for thousands of years- by the same social system. So, if you stand by us you are surely going to get the share of it. Therefore, we are going to stand by you”.

Mandal Commission Report (MCR)
Certainly, we have to concede that there is power in every section of the society. We cannot divide one power from the other. If I am from a poor family, irrespective from what section or society I am born or all that by birth, should I not get an opportunity? So, the contradiction is there. How do we synthesise it? This is the problem poser I want to put. I don’t want to confine it to one action, say, Mandal Commission. If there was no Mandal Commission report, if it was not there, even then the issue would have been there. And, if we don’t recognise the social dynamics of deep frustration, in future it may lead to violent eruption and violent remedies. In Andhra Pradesh the Naxlaites had held a big rally, of about 10 Lakhs or so, I am told, and they endorsed MCR and they said they support V.P. Singh. Not that I support Naxalism or violence. But they belong to that section of the society which has taken to arms.

(V P Singh was at Jawaharlal Nehru University, at New Delhi to deliver his lecture at JP Memorial Lecture on 5 December, 1990)